case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it truly is actually quite obscure about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The legislation as founded in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power more info to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Any court might request to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
States also usually have courts that handle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case law may be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in New York will not be binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more